Thanks. Iāve done it this way. I guess switch association only works one way between devices? Like I can only have switch A controlling switch B. I canāt have switch B also controlling switch A at the same time?
Gotcha, I believe you can set it up the opposite way as well if I read this part of the thread right -
Iām not as familiar with Home Assistant but I know Hubitat also has something called groups you could work withā¦maybe thereās a similar feature you can use as well? Then both switches work off the group vs associations? Iāll try and take a look at that in a bit and will update if I find anything.
Thanks @chack . It seems to work. The only thing that seems off is the lights dim at different speeds, even though both the z-wave and switch dimming parameters are set to 3 on both switches.
Do you mean they dim at different speeds as in some dim faster than others, or maybe that some start dimming before others do and so they end in sort of a staggered group?
If the latter, I think you have options based on this thread -
If the former, can you verify the switches are on the same firmware, have the same settings, etc? Are they all the same bulbs for the different lights?
They dim at different speeds when dimmed from one of the two physical switches. For example, I turn them both on via one switch (this now works great thanks!), and then I start to dim them from that switch, the further away switch dims at a faster rate so that light ends up being dimmer.
Not really a big issue at all, because we set the default local dim on all switches based on sunset/time of day. More of just a nice to have.
Iāll try and get some time tomorrow to take a look at those parameters more and see if I can come up with anything else to try. Donāt have an lzw31 myself to compare and I havenāt actually used associations Iām pretty certain thereās a way to take care of that though.
I think from reading on it some more, and catching up on that thread that what youāre referencing was actually fixed in a later firmware release and you should have Parameters 1/2 and 3/4 in sync. Iād try doing either -
Param1 = 1
Param2 = 1
Param3 = 3
Param4 = 3
OR
Param1 = 3
Param2 = 3
Param3 = 1
Param4 = 1
And confirm which of the two matches up with your expected behavior.
That is from an old post which I reported a bug in the previous behavior. Like @chack mentioned, it has been fixed since then. If you run the updated Inovelli driver/device handler (2020-08-12 or newer) then the behavior matches these descriptions:
If you included them with security, you will likely have better performance if you include them non-secure. I recommend that if you are using association as you will have the quickest response time.