Sorry for the delay here – as @Bry and @BertABCD1234 mentioned, we have addressed the, “choppiness” that our Red Series experienced, however the internals are the same (MOSFET).
What caused the choppiness was more of an algorithm issue than a technology issue.
Is there any world in which a firmware update to the red series could happen to fix the dimming performance on the reds? It is definitely my biggest complaint.
I wish – we tried to get this sorted out numerous times, but every time the manufacturer said, “not enough room on the MCU”.
I’d be curious to hear more about the dimmer capabilities. Not much is mentioned in the manual.
IIRC, the red was forward-phase (leading edge) only. Can the blue do reverse-phase (trailing edge) dimming? eg, The Lutron DIVA is reverse-phase, and its LED compatibility is really good. Adaptive/universal dimming would make this a best-in-class switch.
I’ve noticed that if I use Home Assistant to set the brightness to 1 (out of 100), my LED lights are still fairly bright. I was able to dim them lower with my old switch, a Lutron Diva DVELV-300P. The switch’s Minimum Dim Level parameter is set to 1. It’d be nice if it could dim even lower–I’m guessing the electronics can do it, but the firmware is enforcing a minimum brightness where 1% doesn’t actually translate to the power being on 1% of the time?
I hooked up an oscilloscope to check out the various dimming levels (and FWIW, it’s forward phase):
Brightness 1/100, power on for about 1.520 ms out of 8.333 ms, or 18% of the time, 8% of the sine wave’s area
Brightness 50/100, power on for about 4.880 ms out of 8.333 ms, or 59% of the time, 64% of the sine wave’s area
Brightness 100/100, power on for about 7.360 ms out of 8.333 ms, or 88% of the time, 96% of the sine wave’s area
That’s similar to the Red dimmer. You can see the current waveforms into a resistive load I measured here.
I’m curious what the fascination is with building leading edge dimmers using MOSFETs which are only needed to build trailing edge dimmers. Leading edge dimmers could be made with cheaper TRIACs. LEDs are generally happier with trailing edge dimming and when the hardware has the capability to do trailing edge it seems odd it’s not implemented.
I thought it had to do with the neutral/non-neutral capability. I believe it was said that the TRIAC wouldn’t allow for non-neutral setups. Could be wrong though.
It’s good that it’s not using a TRIAC. But since it’s using a MOSFET, why not have it do trailing edge dimming instead of leading edge?
(My lights work fine either way; I’m mainly interested in having the low end of the dimming range be even lower than it currently is. That said, trailing edge would be nice)
IT’s possible the low end dimming range of LEDs might be better with trailing edge.
Was this hooked up with a Neutral wire? I was thinking 100% would not even have that step. I wonder if you put the switch in “On/Off” mode + neutral if that step remains?
Yes, it’s with a neutral wire. I think it’s common that dimmers at full brightness aren’t actually on 100%. Both the Lutron ELV and a Lutron forward phase dimmer were the same.
I haven’t tried hooking a scope up to the switch in on/off mode, but my understanding is that if it’s using the relay, it’s going to be on 100%.
It’s possible I misunderstood this post but options in the bulleted list here (bottom of post) seem to imply it should be using the relay in single pole + dimmer + neutral:
I’m pretty sure the relay switches the output of the MOSFET dimmer circuit between the load and traveler terminals.
If you look at a 3-wire with a dumb switch wiring diagram, the dumb switch connects the light load to either the load terminal or the traveler terminal depending on which direction it is switched. So, in the dimmer device the dimmer circuit output which is normally connected to the load terminal has to be switched to the traveler terminal. Hence, the relay is needed to do this switch.
I believe this means if the device is used in single pole neutral mode and set to use the relay that the relay click simply switches the MOSFET dimmer circuit to be powering the traveler wire when the device is turned off which disconnects the MOSFET dimmer circuit from the load terminal and doesn’t allow it to power the load. The relay isn’t in parallel with the MOSFET dimmer circuit so it doesn’t bypass it.
The same thing can be done in a RED by setting it to 3-wire dumb switch mode even when it’s a 1-pole neutral wired application. The internal relay starts clicking when it’s turned on or off.
This also explains why this device can’t do a fan. The internal relay isn’t bypassing the dimmer so the dimmer would have to power the fan, which just isn’t done.
So according to that, Single Pole, Dimmer using MOSFET + Relay is an option:
I’m not clear on what that would do exactly though. And I don’t know how to configure the switch between the two modes either. I see in ZHA a “Disable relay click in on off mode” parameter, which I assume is 261 Disable Relay, “Click” Sound:
In neutral on/off setups, the default is to have a clicking sound to notify you that the relay is open or closed. You may disable this sound by creating a, “simulated” on/off where the switch only will turn onto 100 or off to 0.
But that says it’s only for on/off setups. I have that setting disabled on my switches (which is the default)–disabled the disabling, so the relay click is enabled. On the switches set up as dimmers, there’s no click. And on the on/off switches, it does click.
I guess it might be cool if at 100% brightness, the relay clicks on to bypass the MOSFET dimming and connects the line directly to load, but I have no idea if the internals are wired so that’s possible.
I have mine set up in smart bulb mode. If it didn’t bypass the dimmer wouldn’t that cause a problem with my zigbee bulbs? I guess it’s possible my bulbs could be compensating for that brief off period but idk.
No, it wouldn’t. It’s on enough to power smart bulbs.
Huh, I just checked the waveform with the switch in On/Off mode, relay enabled and clicking, and to my surprise, it looks like it does when in dimmer mode at 100% brightness–it’s actually still using the dimming circuitry and not sending out a pure sine wave 
From what I understood from the previously-linked thread, this is not behaving as expected: “We were able to add the relay function … so that there’s more of a, “hard on/off” for single-pole settings.” “… we haven’t had any complaints around flickering or safety concerns in on/off mode, at least there will be an override if someone experiences this.”
Slightly concerned on this. If the dimmer module cannot be bypassed and it cannot put out 100% sine wave power, will it damage non-dimmable lights?
I’m not personally affected by this – i think my lights are dimmable. But when i see “on/off switch” my assumption would be it outputs unmodified sine wave power
It’s exactly what I expected. The relay is a form C contact switching the MOSFETs between the traveler and load screws. It doesn’t bypass the MOSFETs.
